PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSM.L vs. E127.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSM.L vs. E127.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUSM.L is traded in USD, while E127.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the E127.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSM.L achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than E127.L's 20.29% return.


SUSM.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
10.99%
6M
13.35%
1Y
32.03%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*

E127.L

1D
-4.43%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
20.29%
6M
22.17%
1Y
44.86%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSM.L vs. E127.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SUSM.L
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.99%32.23%4.76%1.17%-18.34%-1.05%53.44%
E127.L
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist
20.29%34.89%7.57%8.20%-19.65%-2.76%40.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSM.L and E127.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020

0.90

The correlation between SUSM.L and E127.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSM.L vs. E127.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSM.L
SUSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SUSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

E127.L
E127.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
E127.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
E127.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
E127.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
E127.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
E127.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSM.L vs. E127.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSM.LE127.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.47

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

12.74

-3.83

SUSM.L vs. E127.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the E127.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSM.L and E127.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSM.LE127.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.31

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.35

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.68

-0.29

Drawdowns

SUSM.L vs. E127.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSM.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, roughly equal to the maximum E127.L drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSM.L and E127.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSM.LE127.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.77%

-39.93%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.30%

-12.84%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-16.66%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.54%

-36.89%

+1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-6.96%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-15.74%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.50%

+0.09%

Volatility

SUSM.L vs. E127.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) is 7.13%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that SUSM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E127.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSM.LE127.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

8.94%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

16.77%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

19.32%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

18.74%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

18.74%

+1.49%

SUSM.L vs. E127.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than E127.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSM.L vs. E127.L - Dividend Comparison

SUSM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while E127.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
E127.L
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist
1.78%2.16%3.35%3.76%2.34%1.64%1.70%
SUSM.L
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SUSM.L and E127.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, E127.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

E127.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSM.L.

SUSM.L tracks MSCI EM SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while E127.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSM.L and 0.14% for E127.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSM.L and E127.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer