PRAM.L vs. EIMI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L).
PRAM.L and EIMI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRAM.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 14, 2021. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both PRAM.L and EIMI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRAM.L or EIMI.L.
Correlation
The correlation between PRAM.L and EIMI.L is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PRAM.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PRAM.L:
0.85
EIMI.L:
0.83
PRAM.L:
1.28
EIMI.L:
1.25
PRAM.L:
1.16
EIMI.L:
1.15
PRAM.L:
1.03
EIMI.L:
0.55
PRAM.L:
2.52
EIMI.L:
2.46
PRAM.L:
4.78%
EIMI.L:
4.84%
PRAM.L:
14.11%
EIMI.L:
14.35%
PRAM.L:
-16.21%
EIMI.L:
-38.73%
PRAM.L:
-5.57%
EIMI.L:
-12.29%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAM.L achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 3.31% return.
PRAM.L
3.75%
5.79%
2.81%
12.35%
N/A
N/A
EIMI.L
3.31%
5.69%
2.38%
12.18%
3.37%
3.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRAM.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAM.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRAM.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PRAM.L
EIMI.L
PRAM.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PRAM.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRAM.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PRAM.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAM.L drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAM.L and EIMI.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PRAM.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) is 3.64%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that PRAM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.