PRAM.L vs. XMMS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L).
PRAM.L and XMMS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRAM.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 14, 2021. XMMS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 21, 2017. Both PRAM.L and XMMS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PRAM.L vs. XMMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRAM.L vs. XMMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAM.L Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.76% | 32.60% | 7.14% | 9.82% | -16.79% | 0.00% |
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 1.45% | 34.12% | 7.31% | 8.53% | -20.44% | 2.58% |
Different Trading Currencies
PRAM.L is traded in USD, while XMMS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMMS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAM.L achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than XMMS.L's 1.45% return.
PRAM.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -11.49%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 30.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMS.L
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -11.82%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 31.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRAM.L vs. XMMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAM.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PRAM.L vs. XMMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRAM.L
XMMS.L
PRAM.L vs. XMMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRAM.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 1.67 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.16 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.27 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 8.23 | +0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRAM.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.67 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.27 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAM.L and XMMS.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PRAM.L vs. XMMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRAM.L nor XMMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PRAM.L vs. XMMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, smaller than the maximum XMMS.L drawdown of -40.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAM.L and XMMS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAM.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.74% | -27.76% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -11.06% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.23% | -10.56% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.96% | -10.19% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 3.39% | +0.08% |
Volatility
PRAM.L vs. XMMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) has a higher volatility of 9.17% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) at 8.48%. This indicates that PRAM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRAM.L | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | 8.48% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 13.20% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 18.58% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 18.64% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 20.65% | +0.22% |