SUSL vs. XJH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SUSL (iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF) and XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index, while XJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSL returned 13.77%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XJH. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUSL charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XJH.

Performance

SUSL vs. XJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSL achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than XJH's 13.89% return.

SUSL

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 4.53%
• YTD: 9.27%
• 6M: 10.06%
• 1Y: 27.64%
• 3Y*: 22.34%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: —

XJH

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 6M: 14.47%
• 1Y: 26.28%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSL vs. XJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SUSL iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF	9.27%	18.97%	23.51%	29.08%	-20.22%	31.53%	15.86%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	13.89%	8.12%	12.27%	16.74%	-14.36%	23.43%	29.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSL and XJH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020	0.80

The correlation between SUSL and XJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUSL vs. XJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUSL	XJH
Technology	36.9%	16.0%
Communication Services	14.5%	1.1%
Financial Services	10.6%	14.8%
Healthcare	9.6%	9.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	11.3%
Industrials	8.1%	25.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	3.8%
Real Estate	2.2%	8.2%
Basic Materials	2.1%	4.9%
Energy	2.1%	2.9%
Utilities	1.1%	1.6%

Return for Risk

SUSL vs. XJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSL

SUSL Risk / Return Rank: 60
SUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 59

XJH

XJH Risk / Return Rank: 50
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSL vs. XJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUSL	XJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.62	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.38	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.28	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.75	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.49	10.11	+0.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUSL vs. XJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the XJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSL and XJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUSL	XJH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	1.62	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.38	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.76	+0.10

Drawdowns

SUSL vs. XJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSL drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than XJH's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSL and XJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUSL	XJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.26%	-25.07%	-9.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-9.61%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.91%	-24.56%	+4.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.98%	-25.07%	-1.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-0.02%	-1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-6.83%	+1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.61%	+0.03%

Volatility

SUSL vs. XJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) is 3.68%, while iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that SUSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUSL	XJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	4.62%	-0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.98%	11.89%	-1.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	16.28%	-3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	19.93%	-2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.80%	19.88%	-0.08%

SUSL vs. XJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSL has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XJH's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SUSL vs. XJH - Dividend Comparison

SUSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than XJH's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SUSL iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF	0.93%	0.99%	1.10%	1.27%	1.57%	1.12%	1.38%	1.12%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	1.10%	1.24%	1.24%	1.38%	1.45%	1.04%	0.36%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUSL and XJH in my portfolio?

SUSL and XJH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUSL or XJH?

XJH has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to SUSL (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSL dropped -34.26% vs XJH's -25.07%.

Which ETF is better, SUSL or XJH?

On 5-year performance, SUSL leads with 13.77% vs 7.60% for XJH. On fees, SUSL is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SUSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUSL or XJH?

Over the 5-year period, SUSL has performed better with a 13.77% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUSL or XJH?

SUSL is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XJH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUSL or XJH?

XJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.93% for SUSL.

What is the main difference between SUSL and XJH?

SUSL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SUSL tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index, while XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SUSL and 0.12% for XJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SUSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.