PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSL vs. ESGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSL vs. ESGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SUSL having a 10.13% return and ESGV slightly lower at 9.66%.


SUSL

1D
1.47%
1M
0.51%
6M
8.56%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.42%

ESGV

1D
0.68%
1M
0.09%
6M
9.06%
YTD
9.66%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.60M$18.04M$25.74M
$2.80M$2.67M$3.15M

SUSL vs. ESGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
10.13%18.97%23.51%29.08%-20.22%31.53%18.89%15.09%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
9.66%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%14.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSL and ESGV is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.95

The correlation between SUSL and ESGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUSL vs. ESGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUSL
ESGV

Technology

35.8%
43.1%

Communication Services

11.9%
11.2%

Financial Services

11.4%
11.9%

Healthcare

10.6%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
11.2%

Industrials

8.1%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
3.7%

Energy

2.2%
0.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.0%

Utilities

1.9%
0.1%

Technology

SUSL
35.8%
ESGV
43.1%

Communication Services

SUSL
11.9%
ESGV
11.2%

Financial Services

SUSL
11.4%
ESGV
11.9%

Healthcare

SUSL
10.6%
ESGV
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SUSL
8.5%
ESGV
11.2%

Industrials

SUSL
8.1%
ESGV
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

SUSL
5.4%
ESGV
3.7%

Energy

SUSL
2.2%
ESGV
0.0%

Real Estate

SUSL
2.1%
ESGV
2.6%

Basic Materials

SUSL
2.0%
ESGV
2.0%

Utilities

SUSL
1.9%
ESGV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSL vs. ESGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SUSL
SUSL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SUSL vs. ESGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUSLESGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.65

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

6.66

+0.85

SUSL vs. ESGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSL Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the ESGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSL and ESGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUSL vs. ESGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSL drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, roughly equal to the maximum ESGV drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSL and ESGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSLESGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.26%

-33.66%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-11.60%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-20.41%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

-28.81%

+1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.85%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-6.34%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.87%

-0.11%

Volatility

SUSL vs. ESGV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSLESGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

4.17%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

11.64%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.00%

14.59%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

18.52%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.72%

20.52%

-0.80%

SUSL vs. ESGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSL has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSL vs. ESGV - Dividend Comparison

SUSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than ESGV's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.87%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
0.94%0.99%1.10%1.27%1.57%1.12%1.38%1.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SUSL and ESGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGV has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to SUSL (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSL dropped -34.26% vs ESGV's -33.66%.

On 5-year performance, SUSL leads with 12.85% vs 11.32% for ESGV. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SUSL has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for SUSL.

SUSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.87% for ESGV.

SUSL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ESGV is Large Cap Blend Equities. SUSL tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index, while ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SUSL and 0.09% for ESGV.

SUSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSL and ESGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer