SUSL vs. LCTU

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

SUSL (iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF) and LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index, while LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock. SUSL is passively managed, while LCTU is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSL returned 14.02%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for LCTU. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SUSL charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LCTU.

Performance

SUSL vs. LCTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSL achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly higher than LCTU's 9.23% return.

SUSL

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: 28.66%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 14.02%
• 10Y*: —

LCTU

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 9.49%
• 1Y: 25.98%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSL vs. LCTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SUSL iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF	10.40%	18.97%	23.51%	29.08%	-20.22%	19.88%
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	9.23%	16.96%	24.00%	25.38%	-20.02%	17.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSL and LCTU is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021	0.97

The correlation between SUSL and LCTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUSL vs. LCTU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUSL	LCTU
Technology	35.2%	37.8%
Communication Services	13.5%	9.9%
Financial Services	10.5%	11.3%
Healthcare	10.0%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	10.3%
Industrials	8.1%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	4.5%
Energy	2.1%	3.0%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.2%
Basic Materials	2.0%	1.9%
Utilities	1.7%	2.3%

Return for Risk

SUSL vs. LCTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSL

SUSL Risk / Return Rank: 67
SUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

LCTU

LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 66
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSL vs. LCTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUSL	LCTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.05	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	2.80	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.37	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	2.78	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.76	12.10	-1.34

SUSL vs. LCTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the LCTU Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSL and LCTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SUSL vs. LCTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSL drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than LCTU's maximum drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSL and LCTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUSL	LCTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.26%	-25.93%	-8.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-9.38%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.91%	-19.83%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.98%	-25.93%	-1.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.57%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-6.29%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	2.15%	+0.52%

Volatility

SUSL vs. LCTU - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) at 4.49%. This indicates that SUSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUSL	LCTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	4.49%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.72%	10.05%	+0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.44%	12.76%	+0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.56%	17.23%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.81%	17.04%	+2.77%

SUSL vs. LCTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSL has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LCTU's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SUSL vs. LCTU - Dividend Comparison

SUSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than LCTU's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	1.15%	1.02%	1.27%	1.46%	1.63%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%
SUSL iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF	1.13%	0.99%	1.10%	1.27%	1.57%	1.12%	1.38%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUSL and LCTU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SUSL and LCTU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SUSL or LCTU?

SUSL has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to LCTU (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSL dropped -34.26% vs LCTU's -25.93%.

Which ETF is better, SUSL or LCTU?

On 5-year performance, SUSL leads with 14.02% vs 12.39% for LCTU. On fees, SUSL is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, LCTU has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUSL or LCTU?

Over the 5-year period, SUSL has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUSL or LCTU?

SUSL is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LCTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUSL or LCTU?

LCTU has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 1.13% for SUSL.

What is the main difference between SUSL and LCTU?

SUSL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LCTU is ESG. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SUSL and 0.15% for LCTU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SUSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.