PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSB vs. GVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSB vs. GVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SUSB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.92%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*

GVI

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
0.05%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
1.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSB vs. GVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
0.57%6.81%4.83%5.98%-5.72%-0.76%4.96%7.02%0.54%0.28%
GVI
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
-0.00%6.66%2.92%5.15%-8.28%-1.90%6.38%6.54%0.77%-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSB and GVI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2017

0.75

The correlation between SUSB and GVI shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSB vs. GVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSB
SUSB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GVI
GVI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSB vs. GVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSBGVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.28

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.17

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.47

6.60

+5.87

SUSB vs. GVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the GVI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSB and GVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSBGVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.56

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.25

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.76

-0.04

Drawdowns

SUSB vs. GVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GVI drawdown of -12.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and GVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSBGVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-12.93%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-1.79%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.49%

-2.65%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-12.93%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-1.17%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-1.86%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.59%

-0.23%

Volatility

SUSB vs. GVI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) is 0.64%, while iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that SUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSBGVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.77%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

1.78%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

2.50%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

3.97%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.72%

3.53%

+0.19%

SUSB vs. GVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GVI's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSB vs. GVI - Dividend Comparison

SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than GVI's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVI
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
3.62%3.48%3.40%2.75%1.86%1.46%1.84%2.29%2.16%1.91%1.77%1.75%
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.40%3.81%2.81%1.74%1.30%1.91%2.83%2.61%0.96%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SUSB and GVI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GVI has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to SUSB (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSB dropped -13.25% vs GVI's -12.93%.

On 5-year performance, SUSB leads with 2.20% vs 0.98% for GVI. On fees, SUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SUSB has performed better with a 2.20% return vs 0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GVI.

SUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.62% for GVI.

SUSB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GVI is Short-Term Bond. SUSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while GVI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSB and 0.20% for GVI.

SUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSB and GVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer