SUSB vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
SUSB and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Jul 12, 2017. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both SUSB and BND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SUSB or BND.
Correlation
The correlation between SUSB and BND is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SUSB vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SUSB:
1.94
BND:
0.25
SUSB:
2.89
BND:
0.38
SUSB:
1.37
BND:
1.04
SUSB:
2.89
BND:
0.10
SUSB:
9.84
BND:
0.70
SUSB:
0.49%
BND:
1.92%
SUSB:
2.49%
BND:
5.45%
SUSB:
-13.25%
BND:
-18.84%
SUSB:
-0.88%
BND:
-9.56%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSB achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 1.15% return.
SUSB
4.58%
0.18%
2.97%
4.79%
1.75%
N/A
BND
1.15%
-0.54%
1.03%
1.42%
-0.42%
1.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SUSB vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SUSB vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SUSB vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than BND's 3.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 3.82% | 2.80% | 1.73% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.82% | 3.05% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.34% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
SUSB vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SUSB vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) is 0.73%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that SUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.