PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVI vs. AGZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVI vs. AGZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) and iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GVI having a 1.80% annualized return and AGZ not far ahead at 1.83%.


GVI

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
0.05%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
1.80%

AGZ

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.29%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
1.15%
10Y*
1.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVI vs. AGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GVI
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
-0.00%6.66%2.92%5.15%-8.28%-1.90%6.38%6.54%0.77%1.83%
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
0.16%6.05%3.08%5.18%-7.77%-1.05%5.77%5.51%1.32%2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GVI and AGZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2008

0.69

The correlation between GVI and AGZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVI vs. AGZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVI
GVI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AGZ
AGZ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVI vs. AGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) and iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVIAGZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

1.54

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

2.33

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.93

-0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.60

9.76

-3.17

GVI vs. AGZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the AGZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVI and AGZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVIAGZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.54

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.33

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.60

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.68

+0.08

Drawdowns

GVI vs. AGZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVI drawdown since its inception was -12.93%, which is greater than AGZ's maximum drawdown of -11.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVI and AGZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVIAGZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-11.01%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

-1.35%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.65%

-1.85%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.93%

-10.66%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.93%

-11.01%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.78%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-1.61%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.41%

+0.18%

Volatility

GVI vs. AGZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) and iShares Agency Bond ETF (AGZ) have volatilities of 0.77% and 0.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVIAGZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.76%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

1.93%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

2.58%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.97%

3.54%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.53%

3.03%

+0.50%

GVI vs. AGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GVI and AGZ have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GVI vs. AGZ - Dividend Comparison

GVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than AGZ's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGZ
iShares Agency Bond ETF
3.73%3.75%3.48%3.14%1.56%0.96%2.25%2.32%2.15%1.58%1.52%1.30%
GVI
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
3.62%3.48%3.40%2.75%1.86%1.46%1.84%2.29%2.16%1.91%1.77%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVI and AGZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVI has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to AGZ (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVI dropped -12.93% vs AGZ's -11.01%.

On 10-year performance, AGZ leads with 1.83% vs 1.80% for GVI. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AGZ has performed better with a 1.83% return vs 1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVI and AGZ have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

AGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 3.62% for GVI.

GVI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while AGZ is Government Bonds. GVI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond, while AGZ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Agency Bond Index (USD).

GVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVI and AGZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer