SUSB vs. EUSB
SUSB (iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while EUSB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSB returned 2.24%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for EUSB. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
SUSB vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSB achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly higher than EUSB's 0.33% return.
SUSB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
EUSB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- —
SUSB vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 0.65% | 6.81% | 4.83% | 5.98% | -5.72% | -0.76% | 1.77% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.33% | 7.45% | 1.83% | 5.80% | -12.81% | -1.29% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSB and EUSB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SUSB and EUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSB vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank
SUSB
EUSB
SUSB vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSB | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 1.41 | +0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.73 | 2.11 | +1.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.25 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 1.99 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 6.02 | +6.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSB | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.41 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.08 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.05 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
SUSB vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and EUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSB | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -17.87% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.49% | -2.48% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.49% | -5.76% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -17.45% | +7.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -1.17% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -6.50% | +4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 0.82% | -0.46% |
Volatility
SUSB vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) is 0.64%, while iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that SUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSB | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 1.20% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.42% | 2.50% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93% | 3.57% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 5.77% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 5.42% | -1.70% |
SUSB vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SUSB and EUSB have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSB vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison
SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than EUSB's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.40% | 3.81% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.83% | 2.61% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSB and EUSB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EUSB has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to SUSB (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSB dropped -13.25% vs EUSB's -17.87%.
On 5-year performance, SUSB leads with 2.24% vs 0.44% for EUSB. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, SUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SUSB has performed better with a 2.24% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUSB and EUSB have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
SUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.96% for EUSB.
SUSB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while EUSB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. SUSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while EUSB tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index.
SUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUSB and EUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer