GVI vs. GBF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) and iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF).
GVI and GBF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GVI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. GBF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both GVI and GBF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GVI or GBF.
Key characteristics
| GVI | GBF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.50% | 1.27% |
| 1Y Return | 6.58% | 7.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.43% | -2.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.65% | -0.33% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.51% | 1.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.77 | 1.32 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.72 | 1.98 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.69 | 0.44 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.89 | 4.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.95% | 1.71% |
| Daily Std Dev | 3.71% | 5.57% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.93% | -19.67% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.53% | -10.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVI and GBF is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GVI vs. GBF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GVI achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than GBF's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GVI has outperformed GBF with an annualized return of 1.51%, while GBF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.40% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GVI vs. GBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GVI and GBF have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GVI vs. GBF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) and iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GVI vs. GBF - Dividend Comparison
GVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than GBF's 3.95% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVI iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.33% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.46% | 1.84% | 2.29% | 2.16% | 1.91% | 1.77% | 1.75% | 1.72% | 1.77% |
GBF iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.95% | 3.03% | 2.13% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 2.64% | 2.59% | 2.31% | 2.09% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
GVI vs. GBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVI drawdown since its inception was -12.93%, smaller than the maximum GBF drawdown of -19.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVI and GBF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GVI vs. GBF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) is 0.94%, while iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that GVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.