GVI vs. SCHJ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ).
GVI and SCHJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GVI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. SCHJ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y). It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. Both GVI and SCHJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GVI or SCHJ.
Correlation
The correlation between GVI and SCHJ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GVI vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GVI:
1.18
SCHJ:
2.99
GVI:
1.72
SCHJ:
4.91
GVI:
1.20
SCHJ:
1.62
GVI:
0.54
SCHJ:
0.08
GVI:
3.72
SCHJ:
17.28
GVI:
1.08%
SCHJ:
0.44%
GVI:
3.40%
SCHJ:
2.54%
GVI:
-12.93%
SCHJ:
-98.61%
GVI:
-2.93%
SCHJ:
-98.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVI achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than SCHJ's 6.74% return.
GVI
3.15%
0.55%
2.46%
3.58%
0.74%
1.53%
SCHJ
6.74%
0.55%
3.77%
7.31%
3.26%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GVI vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHJ's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GVI vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GVI vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison
GVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than SCHJ's 6.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVI iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.09% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.46% | 1.84% | 2.29% | 2.16% | 1.91% | 1.77% | 1.75% | 1.72% | 1.77% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 5.64% | 4.22% | 2.52% | 1.32% | 4.36% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GVI vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVI drawdown since its inception was -12.93%, smaller than the maximum SCHJ drawdown of -98.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVI and SCHJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GVI vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) at 0.52%. This indicates that GVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.