SURE vs. QPX
SURE (AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF) and QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SURE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while QPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SURE returned 9.29%/yr vs 13.56%/yr for QPX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SURE charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for QPX.
Performance
SURE vs. QPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SURE achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than QPX's 11.61% return.
SURE
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
QPX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 34.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SURE vs. QPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SURE AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF | 12.47% | 10.58% | 12.17% | 23.30% | -11.24% | 23.87% | 0.91% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 11.61% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 22.29% | 0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SURE and QPX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between SURE and QPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
SURE vs. QPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SURE
QPX
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
SURE
QPX
Consumer Cyclical
SURE
QPX
Industrials
SURE
QPX
Financial Services
SURE
QPX
Energy
SURE
QPX
Communication Services
SURE
QPX
Healthcare
SURE
QPX
Utilities
SURE
QPX
Basic Materials
SURE
QPX
Consumer Defensive
SURE
QPX
Real Estate
SURE
QPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SURE vs. QPX — Risk / Return Rank
SURE
QPX
SURE vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SURE | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 2.47 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.11 | 3.26 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.43 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.02 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.19 | 12.01 | +2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SURE | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.47 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.68 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.68 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SURE vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SURE drawdown since its inception was -35.68%, roughly equal to the maximum QPX drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SURE and QPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SURE | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.68% | -34.74% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -11.56% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.54% | -17.89% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.75% | -34.74% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -8.08% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.90% | -0.99% |
Volatility
SURE vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) is 3.84%, while AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that SURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SURE | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 4.18% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 10.98% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 13.95% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 19.93% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 20.00% | -2.42% |
SURE vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SURE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SURE vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison
SURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SURE AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF | 0.90% | 1.01% | 0.68% | 1.11% | 1.72% | 1.08% | 1.28% | 1.09% | 1.26% | 0.65% | 1.14% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SURE and QPX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QPX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to SURE (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SURE dropped -35.68% vs QPX's -34.74%.
On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 13.56% vs 9.29% for SURE. On fees, SURE is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SURE has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 13.56% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SURE is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.
SURE has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
SURE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QPX is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SURE and 1.46% for QPX.
QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SURE and QPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer