PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SURE vs. QPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SURE vs. QPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SURE achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly higher than QPX's 6.38% return.


SURE

1D
0.26%
1M
0.00%
6M
13.89%
YTD
16.92%
1Y
29.80%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
11.32%
ALL TIME*
13.42%

QPX

1D
0.67%
1M
-1.67%
6M
4.08%
YTD
6.38%
1Y
21.40%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$70.64K$166.89K$141.42K
$52.35K$88.28K$83.48K

SURE vs. QPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SURE
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
16.92%10.58%12.17%23.30%-11.24%23.87%0.71%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
6.38%24.12%17.28%44.63%-30.90%22.29%-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SURE and QPX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020

0.70

The correlation between SURE and QPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SURE vs. QPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SURE
SURE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SURE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SURE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QPX
QPX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SURE vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUREQPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.22

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

1.74

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.12

6.11

+9.01

SURE vs. QPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SURE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the QPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SURE and QPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SURE vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SURE drawdown since its inception was -35.68%, roughly equal to the maximum QPX drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SURE and QPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUREQPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.68%

-34.74%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-11.56%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.54%

-17.89%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.75%

-34.74%

+10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-4.69%

+3.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-7.94%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

3.28%

-1.42%

Volatility

SURE vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) is 3.02%, while AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that SURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUREQPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

5.11%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

13.00%

-3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

15.89%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

20.16%

-3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

20.01%

-2.51%

SURE vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SURE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

SURE vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison

SURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SURE
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
0.87%1.01%0.68%1.11%1.72%1.08%1.28%1.09%1.26%0.65%1.14%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


SURE and QPX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QPX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to SURE (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SURE dropped -35.68% vs QPX's -34.74%.

On 5-year performance, SURE leads with 10.67% vs 10.61% for QPX. On fees, SURE is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SURE has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SURE has performed better with a 10.67% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SURE is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

SURE has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

SURE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QPX is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SURE and 1.46% for QPX.

SURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SURE and QPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer