PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SURE vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SURE vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SURE achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 8.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SURE has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 11.02%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.


SURE

1D
0.43%
1M
4.47%
YTD
12.47%
6M
15.19%
1Y
27.10%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.02%

IGF

1D
1.45%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
8.67%
6M
8.66%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
8.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SURE vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SURE
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
12.47%10.58%12.17%23.30%-11.24%23.87%8.76%28.89%-17.03%13.16%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
8.67%21.31%14.81%6.14%-1.26%11.57%-6.50%25.82%-9.95%19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SURE and IGF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between SURE and IGF has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SURE vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SURE
IGF

Technology

26.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

19.1%

-

Industrials

13.6%
38.8%

Financial Services

13.0%

-

Energy

9.2%
20.1%

Communication Services

8.6%

-

Healthcare

5.2%

-

Utilities

2.0%
41.1%

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.8%

-

Real Estate

0.8%
0.1%

Technology

SURE
26.3%
IGF

-

Consumer Cyclical

SURE
19.1%
IGF

-

Industrials

SURE
13.6%
IGF
38.8%

Financial Services

SURE
13.0%
IGF

-

Energy

SURE
9.2%
IGF
20.1%

Communication Services

SURE
8.6%
IGF

-

Healthcare

SURE
5.2%
IGF

-

Utilities

SURE
2.0%
IGF
41.1%

Basic Materials

SURE
1.0%
IGF

-

Consumer Defensive

SURE
0.8%
IGF

-

Real Estate

SURE
0.8%
IGF
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SURE vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SURE
SURE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SURE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SURE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SURE vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUREIGFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

1.49

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.11

2.14

+0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.86

+0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.19

8.91

+5.28

SURE vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SURE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SURE and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUREIGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.49

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.75

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.50

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.24

+0.55

Drawdowns

SURE vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SURE drawdown since its inception was -35.68%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SURE and IGF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUREIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.68%

-58.33%

+22.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-5.87%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.54%

-14.28%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.75%

-20.83%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.68%

-42.11%

+6.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.88%

+3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-11.87%

+7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.88%

+0.03%

Volatility

SURE vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF (SURE) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUREIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.74%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

8.61%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

10.52%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

13.99%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

16.84%

+0.74%

SURE vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SURE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SURE vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

SURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than IGF's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
2.97%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%
SURE
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
0.90%1.01%0.68%1.11%1.72%1.08%1.28%1.09%1.26%0.65%1.14%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


SURE and IGF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SURE has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to IGF (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SURE dropped -35.68% vs IGF's -58.33%.

On 10-year performance, SURE leads with 11.02% vs 8.35% for IGF. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SURE has performed better with a 11.02% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SURE.

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.90% for SURE.

SURE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SURE and 0.39% for IGF.

SURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SURE and IGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer