PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUN vs. IMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SUN vs. IMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sunoco LP (SUN) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUN achieves a 28.53% return, which is significantly lower than IMO's 41.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SUN has outperformed IMO with an annualized return of 18.66%, while IMO has yielded a comparatively lower 17.61% annualized return.


SUN

1D
1.57%
1M
-6.67%
YTD
28.53%
6M
25.21%
1Y
29.03%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
18.66%

IMO

1D
0.26%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
41.99%
6M
33.35%
1Y
56.95%
3Y*
37.72%
5Y*
32.35%
10Y*
17.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUN vs. IMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUN
Sunoco LP
28.53%8.88%-8.59%49.38%13.95%55.26%6.28%24.78%7.71%17.86%
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
41.99%43.85%10.47%20.89%38.00%95.29%-25.37%7.16%-17.21%-8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SUN and IMO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SUN:

$3.37T

IMO:

$58.80B

EPS

SUN:

$0.06

IMO:

$5.87

PE Ratio

SUN:

1.02K

IMO:

20.67

PS Ratio

SUN:

42.37

IMO:

1.30

PB Ratio

SUN:

1.30K

IMO:

2.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

SUN:

$20.02B

IMO:

$46.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SUN:

$1.75B

IMO:

$7.69B

EBITDA (TTM)

SUN:

$2.10B

IMO:

$6.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUN vs. IMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUN
SUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IMO
IMO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUN vs. IMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sunoco LP (SUN) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUNIMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.47

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

10.04

-3.50

SUN vs. IMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the IMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUN and IMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUN vs. IMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUN drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, smaller than the maximum IMO drawdown of -84.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUN and IMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUNIMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.47%

-84.82%

+19.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-16.51%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.29%

-22.95%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

-29.72%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.94%

-76.96%

+14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

-11.88%

+2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.30%

-21.19%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

5.69%

-1.22%

Volatility

SUN vs. IMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sunoco LP (SUN) is 8.22%, while Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) has a volatility of 9.97%. This indicates that SUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUNIMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.22%

9.97%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.97%

22.21%

-5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.06%

27.31%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.67%

32.66%

-8.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.76%

35.55%

-3.79%

Dividends

SUN vs. IMO - Dividend Comparison

SUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than IMO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
1.90%2.40%2.84%2.73%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.36%2.02%1.70%1.66%
SUN
Sunoco LP
5.74%6.89%6.74%5.59%7.66%8.09%11.47%10.79%12.14%11.63%12.16%6.78%

Financials

SUN vs. IMO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sunoco LP and Imperial Oil Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202220232024202520260
12.45B
(SUN) Total Revenue
(IMO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SUN and IMO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMO has higher volatility (9.97%) compared to SUN (8.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUN dropped -65.47% vs IMO's -84.82%.

IMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUN and IMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer