PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STZ vs. U-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STZ vs. U-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

STZ is traded in USD, while U-U.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the U-U.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than U-U.TO's -7.16% return.


STZ

1D
3.77%
1M
5.69%
YTD
9.07%
6M
2.07%
1Y
-10.17%
3Y*
-13.90%
5Y*
-7.36%
10Y*
1.01%

U-U.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
-8.64%
YTD
-7.16%
6M
1.40%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STZ vs. U-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
9.07%-35.99%-7.11%5.83%-6.43%12.53%
U-U.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
-7.16%18.18%-25.16%86.49%-0.07%17.76%

Correlation

The correlation between STZ and U-U.TO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.11

The correlation between STZ and U-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STZ vs. U-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STZ
STZ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
STZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
STZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
STZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
STZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

U-U.TO
U-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STZ vs. U-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STZU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.06

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

0.23

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

0.46

-1.14

STZ vs. U-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STZ and U-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STZ vs. U-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -67.39%, which is greater than U-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and U-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STZU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.39%

-51.83%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

-25.40%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.28%

-51.83%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.57%

-29.49%

-13.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-24.20%

+7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.01%

12.69%

+2.32%

Volatility

STZ vs. U-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) at 6.16%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than U-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STZU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

6.16%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.36%

25.78%

-2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.17%

35.47%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.56%

42.18%

-17.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.96%

42.18%

-15.22%

Dividends

STZ vs. U-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while U-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
2.75%2.95%1.77%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%
U-U.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

STZ vs. U-U.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.20B2.40B2.60B2.80B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.92B
(STZ) Total Revenue
(U-U.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. STZ values in USD, U-U.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


STZ and U-U.TO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STZ and U-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer