STZ vs. U-U.TO
STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) and U-U.TO (Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund) are both stocks. STZ operates in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries (Consumer Defensive), while U-U.TO operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 3 years, STZ returned -13.90%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for U-U.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STZ vs. U-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STZ is traded in USD, while U-U.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the U-U.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than U-U.TO's -7.16% return.
STZ
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- -10.17%
- 3Y*
- -13.90%
- 5Y*
- -7.36%
- 10Y*
- 1.01%
U-U.TO
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -7.16%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STZ vs. U-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 9.07% | -35.99% | -7.11% | 5.83% | -6.43% | 12.53% |
U-U.TO Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | -7.16% | 18.18% | -25.16% | 86.49% | -0.07% | 17.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between STZ and U-U.TO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between STZ and U-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STZ vs. U-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
STZ
U-U.TO
STZ vs. U-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STZ | U-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.06 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.23 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 0.46 | -1.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STZ vs. U-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -67.39%, which is greater than U-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and U-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STZ | U-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.39% | -51.83% | -15.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -25.40% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.28% | -51.83% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.57% | -29.49% | -13.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -24.20% | +7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.01% | 12.69% | +2.32% |
Volatility
STZ vs. U-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) at 6.16%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than U-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STZ | U-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 6.16% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.36% | 25.78% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.17% | 35.47% | -5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 42.18% | -17.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.96% | 42.18% | -15.22% |
Dividends
STZ vs. U-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while U-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.75% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
U-U.TO Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
STZ vs. U-U.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
STZ and U-U.TO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for STZ and U-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer