U-U.TO vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: U-U.TO or NLR.
Key characteristics
| U-U.TO | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.48% | 16.48% |
| 1Y Return | 86.21% | 51.97% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.36 | 2.15 |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.35% | 23.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.27% | -66.96% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.61% | -1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between U-U.TO and NLR is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
U-U.TO vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, U-U.TO achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 16.48% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
U-U.TO vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
U-U.TO vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
U-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U-U.TO Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 3.90% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.43% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% | 2.48% | 0.69% |
Drawdowns
U-U.TO vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum U-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.27%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -66.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U-U.TO and NLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
U-U.TO vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) at 7.74%. This indicates that U-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.