PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U-U.TO vs. TAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U-U.TO vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U-U.TO is traded in CAD, while TAGS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TAGS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U-U.TO achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than TAGS's 7.46% return.


U-U.TO

1D
-2.38%
1M
-3.25%
YTD
0.87%
6M
8.79%
1Y
21.12%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
10Y*

TAGS

1D
-0.79%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
7.46%
6M
3.64%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
-6.00%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
-1.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U-U.TO vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
U-U.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
0.87%12.78%-18.83%82.05%6.27%22.33%
TAGS
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
7.46%-12.94%-7.24%-8.18%24.54%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between U-U.TO and TAGS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U-U.TO vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U-U.TO
U-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TAGS
TAGS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U-U.TO vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


U-U.TOTAGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

0.03

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

0.13

+0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.01

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

0.03

+0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.87

0.06

+1.81

U-U.TO vs. TAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the TAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U-U.TO and TAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


U-U.TOTAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

0.03

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

-0.12

+0.54

Drawdowns

U-U.TO vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.74%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -67.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U-U.TO and TAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U-U.TOTAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.74%

-67.38%

+18.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.78%

-9.79%

-12.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.74%

-30.67%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.60%

-50.04%

+28.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-47.50%

+25.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.33%

5.35%

+5.98%

Volatility

U-U.TO vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) at 5.49%. This indicates that U-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U-U.TOTAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

5.49%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.37%

10.69%

+14.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.56%

13.17%

+22.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.93%

16.65%

+25.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.93%

18.28%

+23.65%

Dividends

U-U.TO vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither U-U.TO nor TAGS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


U-U.TO and TAGS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U-U.TO and TAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer