STZ vs. PANW

In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a -18.23% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's -4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 6.33%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 23.72% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current STZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is lower than the PANW Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STZ and PANW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 19.02% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) at 9.38%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.