STZ vs. PANW
Compare and contrast key facts about Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STZ or PANW.
Correlation
The correlation between STZ and PANW is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
STZ vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
STZ:
-0.09
PANW:
0.52
STZ:
0.01
PANW:
0.88
STZ:
1.00
PANW:
1.16
STZ:
-0.11
PANW:
0.75
STZ:
-0.23
PANW:
1.57
STZ:
7.66%
PANW:
14.49%
STZ:
19.41%
PANW:
43.57%
STZ:
-75.45%
PANW:
-47.98%
STZ:
-15.42%
PANW:
-6.70%
Fundamentals
STZ:
$42.31B
PANW:
$132.05B
STZ:
$3.12
PANW:
$3.85
STZ:
74.71
PANW:
52.27
STZ:
1.22
PANW:
1.46
STZ:
$7.72B
PANW:
$8.29B
STZ:
$3.91B
PANW:
$6.15B
STZ:
$715.30M
PANW:
$1.40B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a -4.48% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 28.43% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 10.34%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 24.68% annualized return.
STZ
-4.48%
-5.49%
-12.80%
-1.77%
5.32%
10.34%
PANW
28.43%
-2.41%
21.76%
25.83%
37.74%
24.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STZ vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STZ vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 1.72% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
STZ vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STZ vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) is 6.35%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 11.18%. This indicates that STZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
STZ vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities