PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
STZ vs. TAP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


STZTAP
YTD Return9.18%-2.85%
1Y Return18.21%-5.21%
3Y Return (Ann)5.30%3.39%
5Y Return (Ann)6.77%2.57%
10Y Return (Ann)13.88%1.43%
Sharpe Ratio1.00-0.27
Daily Std Dev17.52%21.70%
Max Drawdown-81.94%-73.24%
Current Drawdown-3.32%-36.87%

Fundamentals


STZTAP
Market Cap$46.86B$12.27B
EPS$9.40$5.01
PE Ratio27.2411.55
PEG Ratio2.213.33
Revenue (TTM)$9.96B$11.95B
Gross Profit (TTM)$4.71B$3.66B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.62B$2.44B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between STZ and TAP is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

STZ vs. TAP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than TAP's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has outperformed TAP with an annualized return of 13.88%, while TAP has yielded a comparatively lower 1.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15,565.93%
743.37%
STZ
TAP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Constellation Brands, Inc.

Molson Coors Brewing Company

Risk-Adjusted Performance

STZ vs. TAP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for STZ, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for STZ, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for STZ, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for STZ, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for STZ, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.33
TAP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TAP, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TAP, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TAP, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TAP, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TAP, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.57

STZ vs. TAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the TAP Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of STZ and TAP.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.00
-0.27
STZ
TAP

Dividends

STZ vs. TAP - Dividend Comparison

STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than TAP's 2.83% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
1.40%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%0.00%0.00%
TAP
Molson Coors Brewing Company
2.83%2.68%2.95%1.47%1.26%3.64%2.92%2.00%1.69%1.75%1.99%2.28%

Drawdowns

STZ vs. TAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, which is greater than TAP's maximum drawdown of -73.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and TAP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-3.32%
-36.87%
STZ
TAP

Volatility

STZ vs. TAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) is 4.67%, while Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that STZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.67%
11.66%
STZ
TAP

Financials

STZ vs. TAP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and Molson Coors Brewing Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items