PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXK vs. SMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXK vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXK achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than SMDV's 8.80% return.


STXK

1D
-0.89%
1M
2.04%
YTD
10.46%
6M
9.14%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
10Y*

SMDV

1D
-1.58%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
8.80%
6M
7.57%
1Y
13.74%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXK vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STXK
Strive Small-Cap ETF
10.46%7.82%9.47%20.15%-4.99%
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
8.80%0.26%7.03%8.99%-3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between STXK and SMDV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.85

The correlation between STXK and SMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXK vs. SMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STXK
SMDV

Technology

16.4%
3.2%

Financial Services

15.8%
31.9%

Industrials

14.6%
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
4.1%

Healthcare

12.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

7.4%
7.4%

Energy

7.0%

-

Basic Materials

4.5%
7.8%

Utilities

3.2%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.2%
1.0%

Technology

STXK
16.4%
SMDV
3.2%

Financial Services

STXK
15.8%
SMDV
31.9%

Industrials

STXK
14.6%
SMDV
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

STXK
13.5%
SMDV
4.1%

Healthcare

STXK
12.2%
SMDV
1.8%

Real Estate

STXK
7.4%
SMDV
7.4%

Energy

STXK
7.0%
SMDV

-

Basic Materials

STXK
4.5%
SMDV
7.8%

Utilities

STXK
3.2%
SMDV
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

STXK
3.1%
SMDV
4.8%

Communication Services

STXK
2.2%
SMDV
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXK vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXK
STXK Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
STXK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
STXK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SMDV
SMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXK vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STXKSMDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

0.87

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

1.42

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.41

+1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.12

4.25

+4.87

STXK vs. SMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXK Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the SMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXK and SMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STXKSMDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

0.87

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.38

+0.21

Drawdowns

STXK vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum SMDV drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and SMDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXKSMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.12%

-34.12%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-9.79%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.12%

-21.23%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-2.76%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-5.93%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.25%

-0.41%

Volatility

STXK vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison

Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXKSMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.41%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

10.55%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

15.85%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.12%

18.69%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

20.73%

-0.61%

STXK vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

STXK vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison

STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than SMDV's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
2.42%2.67%2.68%2.69%2.51%2.02%2.13%2.03%1.97%1.84%1.35%1.81%
STXK
Strive Small-Cap ETF
1.39%1.29%1.64%1.14%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STXK and SMDV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMDV has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to STXK (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXK dropped -27.12% vs SMDV's -34.12%.

On 3-year performance, STXK leads with 14.24% vs 9.13% for SMDV. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXK has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXK has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SMDV.

SMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.39% for STXK.

STXK tracks Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SMDV tracks Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 0.40% for SMDV.

STXK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXK and SMDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer