STXK vs. SMDV
STXK (Strive Small-Cap ETF) and SMDV (ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - STXK tracks the Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SMDV tracks the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXK returned 14.24%/yr vs 9.13%/yr for SMDV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SMDV.
Performance
STXK vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXK achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than SMDV's 8.80% return.
STXK
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMDV
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 13.74%
- 3Y*
- 9.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
STXK vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 10.46% | 7.82% | 9.47% | 20.15% | -4.99% |
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 8.80% | 0.26% | 7.03% | 8.99% | -3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXK and SMDV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between STXK and SMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXK vs. SMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXK
SMDV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
STXK
SMDV
Financial Services
STXK
SMDV
Industrials
STXK
SMDV
Consumer Cyclical
STXK
SMDV
Healthcare
STXK
SMDV
Real Estate
STXK
SMDV
Energy
STXK
SMDV
-
Basic Materials
STXK
SMDV
Utilities
STXK
SMDV
Consumer Defensive
STXK
SMDV
Communication Services
STXK
SMDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXK vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank
STXK
SMDV
STXK vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXK | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 0.87 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 1.42 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.16 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 1.41 | +1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 4.25 | +4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXK | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 0.87 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.38 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
STXK vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum SMDV drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and SMDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXK | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.12% | -34.12% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -9.79% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.12% | -21.23% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -2.76% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -5.93% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.25% | -0.41% |
Volatility
STXK vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison
Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXK | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.41% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 10.55% | +1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 15.85% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 18.69% | +1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 20.73% | -0.61% |
STXK vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXK vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison
STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than SMDV's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.42% | 2.67% | 2.68% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.35% | 1.81% |
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 1.39% | 1.29% | 1.64% | 1.14% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXK and SMDV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMDV has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to STXK (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXK dropped -27.12% vs SMDV's -34.12%.
On 3-year performance, STXK leads with 14.24% vs 9.13% for SMDV. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXK has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXK has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SMDV.
SMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.39% for STXK.
STXK tracks Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SMDV tracks Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 0.40% for SMDV.
STXK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXK and SMDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer