STXK vs. FTWO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

STXK (Strive Small-Cap ETF) and FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FTWO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STXK returned 27.10% vs 21.43% for FTWO. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. STXK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FTWO.

Performance

STXK vs. FTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXK achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly higher than FTWO's 7.80% return.

STXK

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.80%
• 6M: 10.00%
• YTD: 15.13%
• 1Y: 27.10%
• 3Y*: 12.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.05%

FTWO

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: -1.24%
• YTD: 7.80%
• 1Y: 21.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	$191.82K	$225.86K	$302.09K
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF	$402.92K	$277.57K	$260.64K

STXK vs. FTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF	15.13%	7.82%	9.47%	9.08%
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	7.80%	43.06%	14.97%	0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between STXK and FTWO is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.59

The correlation between STXK and FTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXK vs. FTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXK	FTWO
Technology	17.3%	-
Financial Services	15.8%	-
Industrials	15.0%	37.5%
Healthcare	13.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	-
Real Estate	7.2%	-
Energy	5.6%	24.3%
Basic Materials	4.2%	26.5%
Utilities	2.9%	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	1.1%
Communication Services	2.1%	-

Return for Risk

STXK vs. FTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STXK

STXK Risk / Return Rank: 68
STXK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
STXK Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
STXK Omega Ratio Rank: 61
STXK Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
STXK Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 38
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STXK vs. FTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STXK	FTWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.04	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	1.51	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.18	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	1.36	+1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	3.06	+5.99

STXK vs. FTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXK Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the FTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXK and FTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STXK vs. FTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, which is greater than FTWO's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and FTWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXK	FTWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.12%	-18.17%	-8.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.81%	-14.55%	+4.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-11.73%	+9.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-3.90%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	6.45%	-3.67%

Volatility

STXK vs. FTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) is 3.53%, while Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that STXK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXK	FTWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	4.84%	-1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	14.95%	-3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.72%	19.04%	-2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.91%	19.18%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.91%	19.18%	+0.73%

STXK vs. FTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXK vs. FTWO - Dividend Comparison

STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than FTWO's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	0.93%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%	0.00%
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF	1.15%	1.29%	1.64%	1.14%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXK and FTWO in my portfolio?

STXK and FTWO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXK or FTWO?

FTWO has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to STXK (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXK dropped -27.12% vs FTWO's -18.17%.

Which ETF is better, STXK or FTWO?

On 1-year performance, STXK leads with 27.10% vs 21.43% for FTWO. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXK has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXK or FTWO?

Over the 1-year period, STXK has performed better with a 27.10% return vs 21.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXK or FTWO?

STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FTWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXK or FTWO?

STXK has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.93% for FTWO.

What is the main difference between STXK and FTWO?

STXK is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FTWO is Energy Equities. STXK tracks Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FTWO tracks Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 0.49% for FTWO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STXK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.