STXK vs. REGL
STXK (Strive Small-Cap ETF) and REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXK returned 14.24%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for REGL. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for REGL.
Performance
STXK vs. REGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXK achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than REGL's 3.98% return.
STXK
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REGL
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.12%
STXK vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 10.46% | 7.82% | 9.47% | 20.15% | -4.99% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.98% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXK and REGL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between STXK and REGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXK vs. REGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXK
REGL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Technology
STXK
REGL
Financial Services
STXK
REGL
Industrials
STXK
REGL
Consumer Cyclical
STXK
REGL
Healthcare
STXK
REGL
Real Estate
STXK
REGL
Energy
STXK
REGL
Basic Materials
STXK
REGL
Utilities
STXK
REGL
Consumer Defensive
STXK
REGL
Communication Services
STXK
REGL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXK vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank
STXK
REGL
STXK vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXK | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.13 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 0.96 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 3.07 | +6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXK | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 0.70 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.52 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
STXK vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum REGL drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and REGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXK | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.12% | -36.37% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -9.67% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.12% | -16.96% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -5.82% | +4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -4.08% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.02% | -0.18% |
Volatility
STXK vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison
Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 3.65%. This indicates that STXK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXK | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 3.65% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 9.23% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 13.22% | +3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 16.11% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 18.33% | +1.79% |
STXK vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXK vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison
STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than REGL's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.24% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 1.39% | 1.29% | 1.64% | 1.14% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXK and REGL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXK has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to REGL (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXK dropped -27.12% vs REGL's -36.37%.
On 3-year performance, STXK leads with 14.24% vs 10.42% for REGL. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXK has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.
REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.39% for STXK.
STXK is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while REGL is Mid Cap Value Equities. STXK tracks Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 0.40% for REGL.
STXK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXK and REGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer