STXG vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

STXG (Strive 1000 Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. STXG is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXG returned 24.12%/yr vs -2.44%/yr for CCOR. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. STXG charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

STXG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -4.00% return.

STXG

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 10.91%
• 1Y: 29.72%
• 3Y*: 24.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -3.32%
• YTD: -4.00%
• 6M: -4.75%
• 1Y: -6.20%
• 3Y*: -2.44%
• 5Y*: -2.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF	11.15%	17.82%	28.53%	35.95%	-3.74%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-4.00%	3.52%	-5.70%	-11.92%	-3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between STXG and CCOR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022	-0.07

The correlation between STXG and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (3 years) to 0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

STXG vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXG	CCOR
Technology	45.0%	16.2%
Communication Services	12.6%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	9.4%
Industrials	9.3%	9.2%
Financial Services	7.6%	17.7%
Healthcare	6.0%	10.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	6.8%
Real Estate	1.7%	2.8%
Basic Materials	1.5%	5.1%
Utilities	0.7%	6.3%
Energy	0.6%	7.2%

Return for Risk

STXG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXG

STXG Risk / Return Rank: 56
STXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
STXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
STXG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
STXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
STXG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 2
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STXG	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	-0.90	+2.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	-1.20	+4.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	0.86	+0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	-0.71	+3.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.70	-1.67	+11.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STXG vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXG and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STXG	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	-0.90	+2.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.11	+1.32

Drawdowns

STXG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXG	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.22%	-22.99%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.62%	-8.75%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.22%	-12.31%	-8.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-20.27%	+20.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.62%	-7.28%	+4.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	3.73%	-0.62%

Volatility

STXG vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 1.76%. This indicates that STXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXG	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	1.76%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.05%	4.98%	+6.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.41%	6.92%	+7.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	11.10%	+6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	10.75%	+6.78%

STXG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than CCOR's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.11%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF	0.45%	0.48%	0.51%	0.55%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXG and CCOR in my portfolio?

STXG and CCOR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXG or CCOR?

STXG has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to CCOR (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, STXG or CCOR?

On 3-year performance, STXG leads with 24.12% vs -2.44% for CCOR. On fees, STXG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXG or CCOR?

Over the 3-year period, STXG has performed better with a 24.12% return vs -2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXG or CCOR?

STXG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXG or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.45% for STXG.

What is the main difference between STXG and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Strive and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.