STXG vs. SCHG
STXG (Strive 1000 Growth ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - STXG tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Growth while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXG returned 24.12%/yr vs 25.53%/yr for SCHG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. STXG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
STXG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.74% return.
STXG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 29.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
STXG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF | 11.15% | 17.82% | 28.53% | 35.95% | -3.74% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 7.74% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -5.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXG and SCHG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between STXG and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXG vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXG
SCHG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
STXG
SCHG
Communication Services
STXG
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
STXG
SCHG
Industrials
STXG
SCHG
Financial Services
STXG
SCHG
Healthcare
STXG
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
STXG
SCHG
Real Estate
STXG
SCHG
Basic Materials
STXG
SCHG
Utilities
STXG
SCHG
Energy
STXG
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
STXG
SCHG
STXG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 1.76 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 2.37 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.31 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 1.70 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 5.70 | +4.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 1.76 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.85 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
STXG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -34.59% | +13.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -16.41% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.22% | -23.39% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -5.20% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 4.90% | -1.79% |
Volatility
STXG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.31%. This indicates that STXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 3.31% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 11.56% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 15.45% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 22.27% | -4.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 21.55% | -4.02% |
STXG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STXG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.48% | 0.51% | 0.55% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, STXG and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STXG has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 25.53% vs 24.12% for STXG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 25.53% return vs 24.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for STXG.
STXG has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.
STXG tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 0.04% for SCHG.
STXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXG and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer