PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXG vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.74% return.


STXG

1D
0.10%
1M
6.55%
YTD
11.15%
6M
10.91%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.91%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.31%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STXG
Strive 1000 Growth ETF
11.15%17.82%28.53%35.95%-3.74%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.74%17.50%34.95%50.10%-5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between STXG and SCHG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.97

The correlation between STXG and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXG vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STXG
SCHG

Technology

45.0%
46.3%

Communication Services

12.6%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
12.7%

Industrials

9.3%
5.8%

Financial Services

7.6%
6.7%

Healthcare

6.0%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.4%

Utilities

0.7%
0.4%

Energy

0.6%
0.8%

Technology

STXG
45.0%
SCHG
46.3%

Communication Services

STXG
12.6%
SCHG
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

STXG
11.4%
SCHG
12.7%

Industrials

STXG
9.3%
SCHG
5.8%

Financial Services

STXG
7.6%
SCHG
6.7%

Healthcare

STXG
6.0%
SCHG
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

STXG
3.4%
SCHG
1.7%

Real Estate

STXG
1.7%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

STXG
1.5%
SCHG
1.4%

Utilities

STXG
0.7%
SCHG
0.4%

Energy

STXG
0.6%
SCHG
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXG
STXG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
STXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
STXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STXGSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

1.76

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

2.37

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.70

+0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.70

5.70

+4.00

STXG vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXG and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STXGSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.76

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

0.85

+0.58

Drawdowns

STXG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXGSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-34.59%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-16.41%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.22%

-23.39%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-5.20%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

4.90%

-1.79%

Volatility

STXG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.31%. This indicates that STXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXGSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.31%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

11.56%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.41%

15.45%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.53%

22.27%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.53%

21.55%

-4.02%

STXG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STXG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
STXG
Strive 1000 Growth ETF
0.45%0.48%0.51%0.55%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, STXG and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STXG has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 25.53% vs 24.12% for STXG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 25.53% return vs 24.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for STXG.

STXG has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

STXG tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 0.04% for SCHG.

STXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXG and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer