STXE vs. EMDV
STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross while EMDV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXE returned 23.32%/yr vs 1.66%/yr for EMDV. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. STXE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMDV.
Performance
STXE vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXE achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 1.51% return.
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
EMDV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.30%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- 1.66%
- 5Y*
- -1.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.04K | $6.93K | $10.37K | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
STXE vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 12.38% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 1.51% | 11.90% | 0.06% | -8.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXE and EMDV is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.59 |
The correlation between STXE and EMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXE vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXE
EMDV
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
STXE
EMDV
Financial Services
STXE
EMDV
Basic Materials
STXE
EMDV
Industrials
STXE
EMDV
Energy
STXE
EMDV
-
Communication Services
STXE
EMDV
Consumer Defensive
STXE
EMDV
Consumer Cyclical
STXE
EMDV
Utilities
STXE
EMDV
Healthcare
STXE
EMDV
Real Estate
STXE
EMDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXE vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank
STXE
EMDV
STXE vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STXE | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.10 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 0.81 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 1.92 | +8.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STXE vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXE drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXE and EMDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXE | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -39.20% | +18.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -7.24% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.38% | -20.71% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -14.51% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -13.59% | +9.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 3.04% | +2.35% |
Volatility
STXE vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that STXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXE | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 3.09% | +9.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.09% | 9.93% | +18.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.83% | 11.68% | +18.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 15.41% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 17.99% | +2.18% |
STXE vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXE vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison
STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, which matches EMDV's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 1.90% | 2.46% | 2.79% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.87% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXE and EMDV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to EMDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXE dropped -20.38% vs EMDV's -39.20%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 23.32% vs 1.66% for EMDV. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 23.32% return vs 1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMDV.
STXE and EMDV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.91%.
STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for STXE and 0.60% for EMDV.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXE and EMDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer