STRV vs. ILCB
STRV (Strive 500 ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - STRV tracks the Bloomberg US Large Cap Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STRV returned 22.74%/yr vs 22.69%/yr for ILCB. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. STRV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
STRV vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with STRV having a 10.98% return and ILCB slightly higher at 11.12%.
STRV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
STRV vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRV Strive 500 ETF | 10.98% | 17.95% | 25.13% | 27.70% | -1.96% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRV and ILCB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.98 |
The correlation between STRV and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
STRV vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STRV
ILCB
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
STRV
ILCB
Communication Services
STRV
ILCB
Financial Services
STRV
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
STRV
ILCB
Healthcare
STRV
ILCB
Industrials
STRV
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
STRV
ILCB
Energy
STRV
ILCB
Utilities
STRV
ILCB
Basic Materials
STRV
ILCB
Real Estate
STRV
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRV vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
STRV
ILCB
STRV vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 500 ETF (STRV) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STRV | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.10 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 14.24 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STRV | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.35 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.64 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
STRV vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRV drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRV and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRV | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -51.53% | +32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -9.09% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.00% | -19.05% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.67% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -6.24% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.97% | +0.08% |
Volatility
STRV vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
Strive 500 ETF (STRV) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRV | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.88% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 9.10% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.42% | 12.02% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 17.13% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 18.16% | -2.06% |
STRV vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
STRV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STRV vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
STRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than ILCB's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
STRV Strive 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, STRV and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ILCB has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to STRV (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRV dropped -19.00% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 3-year performance, STRV leads with 22.74% vs 22.69% for ILCB. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STRV has performed better with a 22.74% return vs 22.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for STRV.
STRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.97% for ILCB.
STRV tracks Bloomberg US Large Cap Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for STRV and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRV and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer