PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRL vs. NBIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STRL vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with STRL having a 180.50% return and NBIS slightly lower at 177.59%.


STRL

1D
2.44%
1M
0.55%
YTD
180.50%
6M
172.57%
1Y
320.41%
3Y*
152.83%
5Y*
104.12%
10Y*
67.37%

NBIS

1D
4.55%
1M
12.10%
YTD
177.59%
6M
164.98%
1Y
362.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STRL vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
180.50%81.79%1.84%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
177.59%202.18%46.25%

Correlation

The correlation between STRL and NBIS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STRL:

$26.66B

NBIS:

$71.79B

EPS

STRL:

$11.19

NBIS:

$3.17

PE Ratio

STRL:

76.77

NBIS:

73.19

PEG Ratio

STRL:

1.63

NBIS:

25.15

PS Ratio

STRL:

9.22

NBIS:

69.73

PB Ratio

STRL:

22.41

NBIS:

9.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

STRL:

$2.88B

NBIS:

$877.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

STRL:

$664.66M

NBIS:

$420.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

STRL:

$429.99M

NBIS:

-$52.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STRL vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STRL vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STRLNBISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.42

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.41

8.03

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.52

18.34

+10.18

STRL vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRL Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is comparable to the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRL and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STRL vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and NBIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STRLNBISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-58.27%

-34.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.02%

-45.47%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.56%

-12.15%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.29%

-18.94%

-27.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.30%

19.86%

-8.56%

Volatility

STRL vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) is 27.60%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 30.23%. This indicates that STRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STRLNBISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.60%

30.23%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.26%

71.43%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.41%

104.41%

-22.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.29%

110.20%

-52.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.58%

110.20%

-56.62%

Dividends

STRL vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither STRL nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

STRL vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
825.68M
399.00M
(STRL) Total Revenue
(NBIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


STRL and NBIS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (30.23%) compared to STRL (27.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 3.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STRL and NBIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer