STRL vs. EFR.TO
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) and EFR.TO (Energy Fuels Inc.) are both stocks. STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while EFR.TO operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, STRL returned 67.37%/yr vs 19.95%/yr for EFR.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. EFR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STRL is traded in USD, while EFR.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the EFR.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 180.50% return, which is significantly higher than EFR.TO's 3.67% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed EFR.TO with an annualized return of 67.37%, while EFR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 19.95% annualized return.
STRL
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 180.50%
- 6M
- 172.57%
- 1Y
- 323.17%
- 3Y*
- 152.83%
- 5Y*
- 104.12%
- 10Y*
- 67.37%
EFR.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -25.63%
- YTD
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 181.35%
- 3Y*
- 32.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.34%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
STRL vs. EFR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 180.50% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 3.78% | 181.88% | -28.28% | 16.13% | -18.42% | 78.98% | 123.03% | -33.16% | 57.96% | 9.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and EFR.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.20 |
The correlation between STRL and EFR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$26.66B
EFR.TO:
CA$5.08B
STRL:
$11.19
EFR.TO:
-$0.30
STRL:
9.22
EFR.TO:
41.45
STRL:
22.41
EFR.TO:
5.03
STRL:
$2.88B
EFR.TO:
$84.86M
STRL:
$664.66M
EFR.TO:
$25.23M
STRL:
$429.99M
EFR.TO:
-$72.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. EFR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
EFR.TO
STRL vs. EFR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.30 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.41 | 3.56 | +6.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.52 | 6.91 | +21.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. EFR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, smaller than the maximum EFR.TO drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and EFR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -99.64% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | -51.27% | +20.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | -61.46% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -68.95% | +21.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | -79.41% | +19.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.56% | -93.60% | +80.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -91.29% | +45.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.30% | 26.36% | -15.06% |
Volatility
STRL vs. EFR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) is 27.60%, while Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a volatility of 29.09%. This indicates that STRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.60% | 29.09% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.26% | 66.45% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.41% | 97.98% | -15.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.29% | 72.11% | -14.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.58% | 71.27% | -17.69% |
Dividends
STRL vs. EFR.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor EFR.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
STRL vs. EFR.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. EFR.TO - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
EFR.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
EFR.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -14.55M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.6%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
EFR.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and EFR.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for STRL and EFR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer