EFR.TO vs. MP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and MP Materials Corp. (MP).

Performance

EFR.TO vs. MP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EFR.TO vs. MP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc.	28.32%	169.01%	-22.21%	13.37%	-13.25%	78.89%	150.00%
MP MP Materials Corp.	-3.18%	208.99%	-14.66%	-20.05%	-42.73%	39.91%	203.50%

Different Trading Currencies

EFR.TO is traded in CAD, while MP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap EFR.TO : CA$6.13B MP : $9.61B
EPS EFR.TO : -CA$0.37 MP : -$0.48
PS Ratio EFR.TO : 89.36 MP : 38.57
PB Ratio EFR.TO : 9.04 MP : 6.14
Total Revenue (TTM) EFR.TO : CA$65.92M MP : $224.44M
Gross Profit (TTM) EFR.TO : CA$9.65M MP : -$18.14M
EBITDA (TTM) EFR.TO : -CA$84.69M MP : -$19.06M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFR.TO achieves a 28.32% return, which is significantly higher than MP's -3.18% return.

EFR.TO

• 1D: 11.30%
• 1M: -12.43%
• YTD: 28.32%
• 6M: 19.37%
• 1Y: 378.61%
• 3Y*: 50.12%
• 5Y*: 27.67%
• 10Y*: 24.16%

MP

• 1D: 5.74%
• 1M: -16.40%
• YTD: -3.18%
• 6M: -28.11%
• 1Y: 91.12%
• 3Y*: 20.77%
• 5Y*: 8.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EFR.TO vs. MP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFR.TO

EFR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
EFR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
EFR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EFR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EFR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
EFR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

MP

MP Risk / Return Rank: 75
MP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MP Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
MP Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MP Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MP Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFR.TO vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFR.TO	MP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.96	0.95	+3.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	2.11	+1.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.24	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.34	1.49	+5.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.76	2.79	+13.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFR.TO vs. MP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the MP Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFR.TO and MP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFR.TO	MP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96	0.95	+3.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.13	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.45	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between EFR.TO and MP is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EFR.TO vs. MP - Dividend Comparison

Neither EFR.TO nor MP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EFR.TO vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than MP's maximum drawdown of -80.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR.TO and MP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFR.TO	MP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.57%	-81.99%	-17.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.09%	-53.79%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.59%	-81.99%	+17.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.46%	-51.08%	-39.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.40%	-42.80%	-38.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.38%	28.20%	-5.82%

Volatility

EFR.TO vs. MP - Volatility Comparison

Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a higher volatility of 24.65% compared to MP Materials Corp. (MP) at 20.30%. This indicates that EFR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFR.TO	MP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.65%	20.30%	+4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	73.90%	56.64%	+17.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.43%	97.10%	-0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.46%	67.62%	+3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.17%	70.92%	-0.75%

Financials

EFR.TO vs. MP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Fuels Inc. and MP Materials Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EFR.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.47M and revenue of 27.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

MP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 52.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EFR.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -22.12M and revenue of 27.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -81.6%.

MP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 52.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

EFR.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -20.79M and revenue of 27.10M, resulting in a net margin of -76.7%.

MP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of 9.43M and revenue of 52.69M, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.