EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO).
Performance
EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 28.32% | 169.01% | -22.21% | 13.37% | -13.25% | 78.89% | 117.74% | -35.92% | 71.24% | 2.26% |
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | 13.01% | 228.81% | 58.12% | -0.52% | 17.27% | -10.57% | -3.53% | -48.64% | 55.76% | -16.79% |
Fundamentals
EFR.TO:
CA$6.13B
OGC.TO:
CA$10.12B
EFR.TO:
-CA$0.37
OGC.TO:
CA$1.14
EFR.TO:
89.36
OGC.TO:
12.76
EFR.TO:
9.04
OGC.TO:
4.47
EFR.TO:
CA$65.92M
OGC.TO:
CA$1.90B
EFR.TO:
CA$9.65M
OGC.TO:
CA$1.06B
EFR.TO:
-CA$84.69M
OGC.TO:
CA$1.01B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFR.TO achieves a 28.32% return, which is significantly higher than OGC.TO's 13.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EFR.TO has outperformed OGC.TO with an annualized return of 24.16%, while OGC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.83% annualized return.
EFR.TO
- 1D
- 11.30%
- 1M
- -12.43%
- YTD
- 28.32%
- 6M
- 19.37%
- 1Y
- 378.61%
- 3Y*
- 50.12%
- 5Y*
- 27.67%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
OGC.TO
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- -24.22%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 6M
- 48.15%
- 1Y
- 206.98%
- 3Y*
- 64.83%
- 5Y*
- 51.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EFR.TO
OGC.TO
EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFR.TO | OGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.96 | 4.14 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.58 | 3.76 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.53 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.34 | 6.71 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.76 | 24.51 | -7.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFR.TO | OGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96 | 4.14 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 1.03 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.30 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.00 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFR.TO and OGC.TO is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO - Dividend Comparison
EFR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | 0.57% | 0.43% | 0.68% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 0.78% | 0.80% | 1.38% | 1.89% |
Drawdowns
EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum OGC.TO drawdown of -95.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR.TO and OGC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFR.TO | OGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -95.74% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.09% | -31.60% | -19.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.59% | -46.87% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.32% | -77.77% | -0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.46% | -24.49% | -65.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.40% | -38.25% | -43.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.38% | 8.66% | +13.72% |
Volatility
EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a higher volatility of 24.65% compared to OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) at 16.48%. This indicates that EFR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFR.TO | OGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.65% | 16.48% | +8.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.90% | 40.53% | +33.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.43% | 50.36% | +46.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.46% | 49.78% | +21.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.17% | 52.74% | +17.43% |
Financials
EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and OceanaGold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFR.TO vs. OGC.TO - Profitability Comparison
EFR.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.47M and revenue of 27.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
OGC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a gross profit of 349.19M and revenue of 662.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
EFR.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -22.12M and revenue of 27.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -81.6%.
OGC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported an operating income of 298.82M and revenue of 662.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.
EFR.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -20.79M and revenue of 27.10M, resulting in a net margin of -76.7%.
OGC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a net income of 332.74M and revenue of 662.43M, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.