STRL vs. APH
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) and APH (Amphenol Corporation) are both stocks. STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while APH operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, STRL returned 58.67%/yr vs 28.28%/yr for APH. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
STRL vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 94.88% return, which is significantly higher than APH's 19.33% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed APH with an annualized return of 58.67%, while APH has yielded a comparatively lower 28.28% annualized return.
STRL
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -23.15%
- 6M
- 66.74%
- YTD
- 94.88%
- 1Y
- 123.02%
- 3Y*
- 111.61%
- 5Y*
- 93.57%
- 10Y*
- 58.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.99%
APH
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 19.33%
- 1Y
- 51.91%
- 3Y*
- 54.89%
- 5Y*
- 35.99%
- 10Y*
- 28.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.19B | $1.10B | $1.42B | |
| $512.00M | $493.44M | $636.07M |
STRL vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 94.88% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 19.33% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and APH is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, STRL and APH have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$18.31B
APH:
$197.70B
STRL:
$11.16
APH:
$4.00
STRL:
53.46
APH:
40.15
STRL:
1.14
APH:
1.34
STRL:
6.42
APH:
7.13
STRL:
15.57
APH:
13.38
STRL:
$2.88B
APH:
$29.01B
STRL:
$664.66M
APH:
$11.17B
STRL:
$429.99M
APH:
$9.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
APH
STRL vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 1.85 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 4.55 | +3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and APH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -63.41% | -29.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.26% | -28.19% | -22.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.26% | -28.19% | -22.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.26% | -28.73% | -21.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | -37.56% | -22.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.95% | -8.86% | -31.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.20% | -13.54% | -32.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.44% | 11.44% | +4.00% |
Volatility
STRL vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 31.97% compared to Amphenol Corporation (APH) at 13.69%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.97% | 13.69% | +18.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.75% | 35.63% | +36.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.81% | 44.23% | +44.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.94% | 31.52% | +27.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.66% | 28.33% | +26.33% |
Dividends
STRL vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.57% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
STRL vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. APH - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.55B and revenue of 8.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 2.58B and revenue of 8.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.5%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 1.77B and revenue of 8.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and APH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (31.97%) compared to APH (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs APH's -63.41%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and APH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer