STM vs. LRCX
STM (STMicroelectronics N.V.) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — STM in Semiconductors, LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, STM returned 31.34%/yr vs 48.23%/yr for LRCX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
STM vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STM achieves a 198.84% return, which is significantly higher than LRCX's 114.54% return. Over the past 10 years, STM has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 31.34%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 48.23% annualized return.
STM
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 21.94%
- YTD
- 198.84%
- 6M
- 199.17%
- 1Y
- 161.70%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- 31.34%
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 24.16%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 303.12%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
STM vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 198.84% | 5.28% | -49.67% | 41.66% | -26.76% | 32.39% | 38.91% | 96.34% | -35.65% | 94.77% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between STM and LRCX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 1994 | 0.56 |
The correlation between STM and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STM:
$71.50B
LRCX:
$463.20B
STM:
$0.15
LRCX:
$5.29
STM:
499.10
LRCX:
69.37
STM:
5.83
LRCX:
21.46
STM:
4.02
LRCX:
43.76
STM:
$12.40B
LRCX:
$21.68B
STM:
$4.20B
LRCX:
$10.84B
STM:
$2.32B
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STM vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
STM
LRCX
STM vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STM | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.63 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 15.26 | -10.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.20 | 51.20 | -41.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STM vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STM drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STM and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STM | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -87.90% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.35% | -20.01% | -16.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.66% | -47.10% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.66% | -56.39% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.66% | -56.39% | -10.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | 0.00% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.19% | -28.17% | -27.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.93% | 5.95% | +9.98% |
Volatility
STM vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a higher volatility of 24.29% compared to Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 21.52%. This indicates that STM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STM | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.29% | 21.52% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.90% | 43.63% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.64% | 52.78% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.18% | 46.57% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.37% | 44.92% | -0.55% |
Dividends
STM vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than LRCX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 0.47% | 1.39% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.98% | 2.10% | 5.11% |
Financials
STM vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STMicroelectronics N.V. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STM vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
STM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 3.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.8%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
STM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported an operating income of 96.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
STM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a net income of 37.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STM and LRCX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STM has higher volatility (24.29%) compared to LRCX (21.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STM dropped -94.40% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 3.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STM and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer