STLG vs. RSPFX
STLG (iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF) and RSPFX (Victory RS Partners Fund) are both funds - STLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while RSPFX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Victory. Over the past 5 years, STLG returned 20.26%/yr vs 7.63%/yr for RSPFX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STLG charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for RSPFX.
Performance
STLG vs. RSPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than RSPFX's 12.25% return.
STLG
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 21.80%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.60%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPFX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
STLG vs. RSPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 21.29% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
RSPFX Victory RS Partners Fund | 12.25% | 2.50% | 14.86% | 15.80% | -4.55% | 29.45% | -0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLG and RSPFX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between STLG and RSPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLG vs. RSPFX — Risk / Return Rank
STLG
RSPFX
STLG vs. RSPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and Victory RS Partners Fund (RSPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STLG | RSPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.24 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.97 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | 6.40 | +6.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STLG | RSPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 1.38 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.36 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.56 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
STLG vs. RSPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum RSPFX drawdown of -59.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and RSPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLG | RSPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -59.26% | +27.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -10.85% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -22.65% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -26.89% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -1.48% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -10.68% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.33% | +0.07% |
Volatility
STLG vs. RSPFX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Victory RS Partners Fund (RSPFX) at 4.30%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLG | RSPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 4.30% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 10.70% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 15.49% | +2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 21.58% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 22.08% | +1.81% |
STLG vs. RSPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPFX's 1.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
STLG vs. RSPFX - Dividend Comparison
STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than RSPFX's 4.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPFX Victory RS Partners Fund | 4.86% | 5.45% | 5.79% | 5.66% | 8.92% | 16.56% | 1.52% | 9.92% | 24.51% | 23.61% | 5.62% | 3.18% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STLG and RSPFX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STLG has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to RSPFX (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLG dropped -31.34% vs RSPFX's -59.26%.
STLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STLG and RSPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer