PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RSPFX vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RSPFXXLF
YTD Return14.30%21.11%
1Y Return24.38%31.77%
3Y Return (Ann)10.16%8.38%
5Y Return (Ann)11.86%12.14%
10Y Return (Ann)6.21%13.48%
Sharpe Ratio1.432.43
Daily Std Dev16.82%13.03%
Max Drawdown-63.11%-82.43%
Current Drawdown-0.37%-1.20%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between RSPFX and XLF is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

RSPFX vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RSPFX achieves a 14.30% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 21.11% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPFX has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 6.21%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
6.41%
8.28%
RSPFX
XLF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPFX vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPFX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.


RSPFX
Victory RS Partners Fund
Expense ratio chart for RSPFX: current value at 1.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.45%
Expense ratio chart for XLF: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSPFX vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Partners Fund (RSPFX) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPFX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RSPFX, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RSPFX, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.07
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RSPFX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RSPFX, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RSPFX, currently valued at 6.69, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.69
XLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLF, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.002.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLF, currently valued at 3.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLF, currently valued at 11.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.47

RSPFX vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of RSPFX and XLF.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.43
2.43
RSPFX
XLF

Dividends

RSPFX vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

RSPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than XLF's 1.10% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RSPFX
Victory RS Partners Fund
4.95%5.66%8.91%16.56%1.52%9.92%24.51%23.61%5.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.10%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%1.81%

Drawdowns

RSPFX vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPFX drawdown since its inception was -63.11%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPFX and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.37%
-1.20%
RSPFX
XLF

Volatility

RSPFX vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Victory RS Partners Fund (RSPFX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 3.64%. This indicates that RSPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.61%
3.64%
RSPFX
XLF