PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPFX vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPFX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Partners Fund (RSPFX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPFX achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPFX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 11.58%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.28% annualized return.


RSPFX

1D
0.99%
1M
3.71%
YTD
15.69%
6M
13.49%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
11.58%

VUG

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
5.76%
6M
5.17%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
18.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPFX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPFX
Victory RS Partners Fund
15.69%2.50%14.86%15.80%-4.55%29.45%0.45%30.76%-12.30%14.24%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.76%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPFX and VUG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPFX and VUG has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPFX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPFX
RSPFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
RSPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPFX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Partners Fund (RSPFX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPFXVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

1.46

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.49

4.99

+2.50

RSPFX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPFX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPFX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPFX drawdown since its inception was -59.26%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPFX and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPFXVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.26%

-50.68%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-16.53%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.65%

-22.85%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.89%

-35.61%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.91%

-35.61%

-7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-4.86%

+4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-7.09%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

4.82%

-1.50%

Volatility

RSPFX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory RS Partners Fund (RSPFX) is 4.15%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that RSPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPFXVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

6.55%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

13.32%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

16.80%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

22.36%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

21.53%

+0.56%

RSPFX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPFX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPFX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

RSPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPFX
Victory RS Partners Fund
4.71%5.45%5.79%5.66%8.92%16.56%1.52%9.92%24.51%23.61%5.62%3.18%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPFX and VUG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to RSPFX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPFX dropped -59.26% vs VUG's -50.68%.

RSPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPFX and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer