STLG vs. BBUS
STLG (iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - STLG tracks the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STLG returned 20.26%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STLG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
STLG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.
STLG
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 21.80%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.60%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
STLG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 21.29% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLG and BBUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between STLG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
STLG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STLG
BBUS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
STLG
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
STLG
BBUS
Healthcare
STLG
BBUS
Communication Services
STLG
BBUS
Industrials
STLG
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
STLG
BBUS
Financial Services
STLG
BBUS
Utilities
STLG
BBUS
Energy
STLG
BBUS
Basic Materials
STLG
BBUS
Real Estate
STLG
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
STLG
BBUS
STLG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STLG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.00 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | 13.76 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STLG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.33 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.79 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.84 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
STLG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -35.35% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -9.21% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -19.01% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -25.46% | -5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.74% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -5.46% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.00% | +1.40% |
Volatility
STLG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 2.88% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 8.96% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 11.87% | +6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 17.03% | +4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 19.59% | +4.30% |
STLG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STLG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, STLG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STLG has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLG dropped -31.34% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, STLG leads with 20.26% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, STLG has performed better with a 20.26% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for STLG.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.25% for STLG.
STLG tracks Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for STLG and 0.02% for BBUS.
STLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STLG and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer