PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STLG vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STLG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.


STLG

1D
-0.72%
1M
11.92%
YTD
21.29%
6M
21.80%
1Y
43.57%
3Y*
33.60%
5Y*
20.26%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STLG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
STLG
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF
21.29%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between STLG and BBUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020

0.90

The correlation between STLG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

STLG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STLG
BBUS

Technology

54.2%
37.1%

Consumer Cyclical

16.7%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.1%

Communication Services

6.3%
10.8%

Industrials

5.7%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.5%

Financial Services

2.2%
10.8%

Utilities

1.6%
2.6%

Energy

1.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

0.2%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.7%

Technology

STLG
54.2%
BBUS
37.1%

Consumer Cyclical

STLG
16.7%
BBUS
9.4%

Healthcare

STLG
8.8%
BBUS
8.1%

Communication Services

STLG
6.3%
BBUS
10.8%

Industrials

STLG
5.7%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

STLG
3.0%
BBUS
4.5%

Financial Services

STLG
2.2%
BBUS
10.8%

Utilities

STLG
1.6%
BBUS
2.6%

Energy

STLG
1.1%
BBUS
3.2%

Basic Materials

STLG
0.2%
BBUS
1.2%

Real Estate

STLG
0.0%
BBUS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STLG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STLG
STLG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
STLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
STLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STLG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STLGBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.00

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.85

13.76

-0.91

STLG vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLG and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STLGBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.33

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.79

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.84

+0.06

Drawdowns

STLG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STLGBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-35.35%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-9.21%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-19.01%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-25.46%

-5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.74%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-5.46%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.00%

+1.40%

Volatility

STLG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STLGBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

2.88%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

8.96%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

11.87%

+6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

17.03%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

19.59%

+4.30%

STLG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STLG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
STLG
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, STLG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STLG has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLG dropped -31.34% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, STLG leads with 20.26% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, STLG has performed better with a 20.26% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for STLG.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.25% for STLG.

STLG tracks Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for STLG and 0.02% for BBUS.

STLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STLG and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer