STLG vs. AGG
STLG (iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF) and AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while AGG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STLG returned 18.36%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for AGG. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STLG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for AGG.
Performance
STLG vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.47% return.
STLG
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 36.49%
- 3Y*
- 30.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- —
AGG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
STLG vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 16.17% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.47% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLG and AGG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.17 |
The correlation between STLG and AGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLG vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank
STLG
AGG
STLG vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STLG | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 1.57 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 4.54 | +5.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STLG vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and AGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLG | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -18.43% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -2.76% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -6.11% | -17.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -17.82% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.93% | -1.93% | -3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -2.71% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 0.96% | +2.56% |
Volatility
STLG vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.10%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLG | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.62% | 1.10% | +7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 2.83% | +12.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 3.81% | +15.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 6.10% | +16.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 5.41% | +18.57% |
STLG vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STLG vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than AGG's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.98% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STLG and AGG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STLG has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to AGG (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLG dropped -31.34% vs AGG's -18.43%.
On 5-year performance, STLG leads with 18.36% vs 0.07% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, STLG has performed better with a 18.36% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for STLG.
AGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.27% for STLG.
STLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AGG is Total Bond Market. STLG tracks Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for STLG and 0.03% for AGG.
STLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STLG and AGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer