SSXU vs. ARCC
SSXU (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Day Hagan, while ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SSXU returned 11.59%/yr vs 9.14%/yr for ARCC. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SSXU vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSXU achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -0.17% return.
SSXU
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 16.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.39%
ARCC
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- -5.64%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $82.65M | $85.21M | $94.25M | |
| $118.06K | $72.09K | $330.31K |
SSXU vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF | 3.85% | 27.09% | 5.28% | 9.56% | 2.14% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -0.17% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | 8.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSXU and ARCC is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSXU vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
SSXU
ARCC
SSXU vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSXU | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.97 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | -0.33 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.54 | -0.59 | +5.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSXU vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSXU drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXU and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSXU | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -79.36% | +65.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -17.35% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.91% | -19.35% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.63% | -9.13% | +4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -9.12% | +5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 9.52% | -5.89% |
Volatility
SSXU vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 4.82%. This indicates that SSXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSXU | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 4.82% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.60% | 14.88% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.61% | 19.00% | -4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 20.00% | -5.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 25.59% | -11.12% |
Dividends
SSXU vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
SSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than ARCC's 10.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.02% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF | 2.56% | 2.66% | 2.74% | 2.07% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSXU and ARCC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSXU has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to ARCC (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSXU dropped -13.91% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
SSXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSXU and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer