SSLN.L vs. ISAC.L
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L returned 16.77%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for ISAC.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSLN.L is traded in GBp, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L has outperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 16.77%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.64% annualized return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 23.96%
- 1Y
- 113.86%
- 3Y*
- 41.85%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.77%
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 30.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
SSLN.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 2.69% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.06% | 13.64% | 19.87% | 16.44% | -8.43% | 19.97% | 12.26% | 20.98% | -4.37% | 13.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and ISAC.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2011 | 0.16 |
The correlation between SSLN.L and ISAC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (5 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
ISAC.L
SSLN.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLN.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.48 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 4.41 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 16.95 | -10.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLN.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.55 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.88 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.88 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.86 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.95% | -25.84% | -44.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.72% | -6.88% | -31.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.72% | -18.33% | -20.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -18.33% | -20.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -25.84% | -12.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.93% | -0.36% | -33.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -3.56% | -41.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.56% | 1.80% | +15.76% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 16.55% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.73%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.55% | 3.73% | +12.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.03% | 9.25% | +42.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 11.92% | +42.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 14.29% | +19.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 15.49% | +14.21% |
SSLN.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SSLN.L and ISAC.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLN.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L and ISAC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer