ISAC.L vs. SWDA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L).
ISAC.L and SWDA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2001. SWDA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both ISAC.L and SWDA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ISAC.L or SWDA.L.
Key characteristics
| ISAC.L | SWDA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.46% | 11.58% |
| 1Y Return | 24.16% | 16.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.38% | 8.73% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.33% | 11.15% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.68% | 11.96% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.05 | 1.63 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.09% | 10.42% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.82% | -25.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.19% | -1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISAC.L and SWDA.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ISAC.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ISAC.L achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than SWDA.L's 11.58% return. Over the past 10 years, ISAC.L has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 8.68%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.96% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISAC.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ISAC.L and SWDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ISAC.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ISAC.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISAC.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ISAC.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISAC.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAC.L and SWDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ISAC.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) is 3.66%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that ISAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.