ISAC.L vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
ISAC.L and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2001. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both ISAC.L and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ISAC.L or VT.
Key characteristics
| ISAC.L | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.88% | 14.45% |
| 1Y Return | 24.24% | 23.29% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.19% | 5.81% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.27% | 11.37% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.62% | 8.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.93 | 1.88 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.10% | 12.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.82% | -50.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.70% | -0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISAC.L and VT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ISAC.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ISAC.L having a 14.88% return and VT slightly lower at 14.45%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISAC.L having a 8.62% annualized return and VT not far ahead at 8.91%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISAC.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ISAC.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ISAC.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.54% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
ISAC.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISAC.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAC.L and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ISAC.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) is 3.59%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that ISAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.