SSLN.L vs. DRDR.L
SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and DRDR.L (iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while DRDR.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSLN.L returned 17.80%/yr vs -0.78%/yr for DRDR.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DRDR.L.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. DRDR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a -19.65% return, which is significantly lower than DRDR.L's 6.68% return.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -18.72%
- 6M
- -37.29%
- YTD
- -19.65%
- 1Y
- 51.77%
- 3Y*
- 30.84%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
DRDR.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 1Y
- 25.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L vs. DRDR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -19.65% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.83% | 41.04% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
DRDR.L iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.68% | 10.25% | 2.62% | -2.51% | -14.93% | -5.21% | 48.69% | 8.88% | 2.12% | 23.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and DRDR.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. DRDR.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
DRDR.L
SSLN.L vs. DRDR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSLN.L | DRDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 1.99 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | 4.87 | -2.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. DRDR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -78.44%, which is greater than DRDR.L's maximum drawdown of -38.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and DRDR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | DRDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.44% | -38.49% | -39.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.30% | -12.51% | -35.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.30% | -22.88% | -25.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.30% | -35.81% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.30% | -12.21% | -36.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.60% | -17.39% | -42.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.96% | 5.13% | +17.83% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. DRDR.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 13.49% compared to iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) at 5.03%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRDR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | DRDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.49% | 5.03% | +8.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.20% | 11.99% | +39.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.78% | 15.94% | +40.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.89% | 22.14% | +14.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 22.54% | +8.56% |
SSLN.L vs. DRDR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DRDR.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. DRDR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLN.L nor DRDR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLN.L and DRDR.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DRDR.L.
SSLN.L is categorized as Silver, while DRDR.L is Health & Biotech Equities. SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while DRDR.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSLN.L and 0.40% for DRDR.L.
Find the right allocation for SSLN.L and DRDR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer