DRDR.L vs. AGES.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L).
DRDR.L and AGES.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DRDR.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Sep 8, 2016. AGES.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 8, 2016. Both DRDR.L and AGES.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DRDR.L or AGES.L.
Key characteristics
| DRDR.L | AGES.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.39% | 13.65% |
| 1Y Return | 21.65% | 25.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.69% | 2.60% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.60% | 6.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.52 | 2.13 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.29 | 3.00 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.26 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.54 | 1.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.53 | 13.00 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.92% | 1.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.66% | 10.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.49% | -31.02% |
| Current Drawdown | -23.35% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRDR.L and AGES.L is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DRDR.L vs. AGES.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DRDR.L achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than AGES.L's 13.65% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRDR.L vs. AGES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DRDR.L and AGES.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DRDR.L vs. AGES.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DRDR.L vs. AGES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRDR.L nor AGES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DRDR.L vs. AGES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRDR.L drawdown since its inception was -38.49%, which is greater than AGES.L's maximum drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRDR.L and AGES.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DRDR.L vs. AGES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) is 3.25%, while iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that DRDR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.