DRDR.L vs. IUHC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L).
DRDR.L and IUHC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DRDR.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Sep 8, 2016. IUHC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. It was launched on Jun 15, 2020. Both DRDR.L and IUHC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DRDR.L vs. IUHC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRDR.L vs. IUHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRDR.L iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -1.08% | 10.25% | 2.62% | -2.51% | -14.93% | -5.21% | 48.69% | 8.88% | 2.12% | 23.69% |
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -3.00% | 6.50% | 3.95% | -3.36% | 8.95% | 28.79% | 8.64% | 16.01% | 10.63% | 11.64% |
Different Trading Currencies
DRDR.L is traded in GBp, while IUHC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUHC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRDR.L achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly higher than IUHC.L's -3.00% return.
DRDR.L
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 16.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- -1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
IUHC.L
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 0.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRDR.L vs. IUHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRDR.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IUHC.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRDR.L vs. IUHC.L — Risk / Return Rank
DRDR.L
IUHC.L
DRDR.L vs. IUHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRDR.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.05 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 0.19 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.02 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 0.18 | +1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 0.35 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRDR.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.05 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.48 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.61 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRDR.L and IUHC.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DRDR.L vs. IUHC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRDR.L nor IUHC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DRDR.L vs. IUHC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRDR.L drawdown since its inception was -38.49%, which is greater than IUHC.L's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRDR.L and IUHC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRDR.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.49% | -27.44% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -10.72% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.81% | -17.63% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.61% | -7.00% | -11.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.08% | -4.86% | -10.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 4.93% | -1.27% |
Volatility
DRDR.L vs. IUHC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) at 5.06%. This indicates that DRDR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRDR.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 5.06% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 10.38% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.17% | 17.46% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 14.96% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 16.55% | +2.05% |