SSCVX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
SSCVX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Apr 25, 1997. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
SSCVX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSCVX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund | 5.82% | 5.46% | 12.33% | 12.47% | -15.35% | 31.25% | 9.61% | 18.76% | -13.70% | 12.65% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -10.22% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSCVX achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 8.32%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.26% annualized return.
SSCVX
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 22.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
CTCAX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 20.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSCVX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCVX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSCVX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
SSCVX
CTCAX
SSCVX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSCVX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.57 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.67 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 5.92 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSCVX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.49 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.82 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.70 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSCVX and CTCAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSCVX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
SSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, more than CTCAX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund | 10.36% | 10.96% | 20.45% | 6.56% | 4.62% | 6.64% | 6.45% | 0.12% | 7.59% | 13.50% | 6.18% | 12.44% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.66% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
SSCVX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCVX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSCVX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.34% | -61.04% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -14.43% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.22% | -39.55% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.87% | -39.55% | -9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -14.43% | +6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -10.75% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 4.07% | -0.33% |
Volatility
SSCVX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) is 6.07%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that SSCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSCVX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 7.45% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 16.24% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.83% | 27.00% | -4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 25.81% | -4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 24.66% | -1.22% |