SSCVX vs. SCHA
SSCVX (Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both funds - SSCVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia, while SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX returned 9.86%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSCVX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
SSCVX vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSCVX achieves a 22.84% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 24.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 9.86%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.91% annualized return.
SSCVX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 22.84%
- 6M
- 20.32%
- 1Y
- 37.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
SCHA
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 24.67%
- 6M
- 21.39%
- 1Y
- 45.75%
- 3Y*
- 20.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
SSCVX vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund | 22.84% | 5.46% | 12.33% | 12.47% | -15.35% | 31.25% | 9.61% | 18.76% | -13.70% | 12.65% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 24.67% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSCVX and SCHA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SSCVX and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSCVX vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
SSCVX
SCHA
SSCVX vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSCVX | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 4.84 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.96 | 17.72 | -2.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSCVX vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCVX and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSCVX | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.34% | -42.41% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.88% | -9.50% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.22% | -27.29% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.22% | -30.79% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.87% | -42.41% | -6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | 0.00% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -7.56% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.59% | -0.03% |
Volatility
SSCVX vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) is 5.41%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that SSCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSCVX | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 6.45% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 13.80% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 18.71% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 22.03% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.47% | 22.78% | +0.69% |
SSCVX vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCVX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSCVX vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than SCHA's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.96% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund | 8.92% | 10.96% | 20.45% | 6.56% | 4.62% | 6.64% | 6.45% | 0.12% | 7.59% | 13.50% | 6.18% | 12.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSCVX and SCHA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to SSCVX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCVX dropped -65.34% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSCVX and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer