SSCVX vs. USBNX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SSCVX (Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund) and USBNX (Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX returned 9.86%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for USBNX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSCVX charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for USBNX.

Performance

SSCVX vs. USBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCVX achieves a 22.84% return, which is significantly higher than USBNX's 14.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX has outperformed USBNX with an annualized return of 9.86%, while USBNX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.

SSCVX

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 22.84%
• 6M: 20.32%
• 1Y: 37.81%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 8.38%
• 10Y*: 9.86%

USBNX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 14.00%
• 6M: 11.78%
• 1Y: 25.28%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 8.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCVX vs. USBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund	22.84%	5.46%	12.33%	12.47%	-15.35%	31.25%	9.61%	18.76%	-13.70%	12.65%
USBNX Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund	14.00%	8.02%	8.64%	12.83%	-5.09%	15.35%	-4.77%	23.53%	-11.05%	6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCVX and USBNX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998	0.88

The correlation between SSCVX and USBNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SSCVX vs. USBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCVX

SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 73
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

USBNX

USBNX Risk / Return Rank: 44
USBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
USBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
USBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
USBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
USBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCVX vs. USBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSCVX	USBNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.71	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.58	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.87	2.75	+2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.96	8.48	+6.48

SSCVX vs. USBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the USBNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCVX and USBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSCVX vs. USBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, roughly equal to the maximum USBNX drawdown of -64.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCVX and USBNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSCVX	USBNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.34%	-64.40%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.88%	-9.19%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.22%	-21.56%	-7.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.22%	-26.01%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.87%	-46.96%	-1.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-0.91%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.83%	-13.61%	+1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	2.96%	-0.40%

Volatility

SSCVX vs. USBNX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) at 3.65%. This indicates that SSCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USBNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSCVX	USBNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	3.65%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	9.34%	+2.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.66%	14.82%	+2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.20%	18.74%	+2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.47%	21.67%	+1.80%

SSCVX vs. USBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCVX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than USBNX's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSCVX vs. USBNX - Dividend Comparison

SSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, less than USBNX's 12.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund	8.92%	10.96%	20.45%	6.56%	4.62%	6.64%	6.45%	0.12%	7.59%	13.50%	6.18%	12.44%
USBNX Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund	12.11%	13.81%	3.27%	0.86%	10.05%	0.75%	0.68%	7.91%	8.39%	6.21%	1.17%	7.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSCVX and USBNX in my portfolio?

SSCVX and USBNX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSCVX or USBNX?

SSCVX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to USBNX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCVX dropped -65.34% vs USBNX's -64.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.