PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCVX vs. SWTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCVX vs. SWTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCVX achieves a 21.52% return, which is significantly higher than SWTSX's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX has underperformed SWTSX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while SWTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.02% annualized return.


SSCVX

1D
-1.31%
1M
3.95%
YTD
21.52%
6M
20.01%
1Y
36.75%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
9.87%

SWTSX

1D
1.11%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.74%
1Y
27.23%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCVX vs. SWTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
21.52%5.46%12.33%12.47%-15.35%31.25%9.61%18.76%-13.70%12.65%
SWTSX
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
10.74%17.04%23.84%26.05%-19.54%25.65%20.71%30.90%-5.35%21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCVX and SWTSX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

0.86

The correlation between SSCVX and SWTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCVX vs. SWTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCVX
SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SWTSX
SWTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SWTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SWTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCVX vs. SWTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSCVXSWTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

3.08

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.51

13.71

+0.80

SSCVX vs. SWTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the SWTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCVX and SWTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSCVX vs. SWTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than SWTSX's maximum drawdown of -54.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCVX and SWTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCVXSWTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.34%

-54.60%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-8.88%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.22%

-19.43%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.22%

-25.40%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.87%

-35.01%

-13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-1.14%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-10.55%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.99%

+0.57%

Volatility

SSCVX vs. SWTSX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX) at 4.87%. This indicates that SSCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCVXSWTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

4.87%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

10.12%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

12.86%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

17.53%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

18.65%

+4.83%

SSCVX vs. SWTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCVX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SWTSX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSCVX vs. SWTSX - Dividend Comparison

SSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, more than SWTSX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
9.02%10.96%20.45%6.56%4.62%6.64%6.45%0.12%7.59%13.50%6.18%12.44%
SWTSX
Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund
0.99%1.10%1.24%1.41%1.62%1.46%1.63%1.92%2.58%1.83%2.32%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSCVX and SWTSX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSCVX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to SWTSX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCVX dropped -65.34% vs SWTSX's -54.60%.

SWTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCVX and SWTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer