CTCAX vs. VGT

In the year-to-date period, CTCAX achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CTCAX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 15.93%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.66% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CTCAX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CTCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTCAX and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CTCAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

The maximum CTCAX drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTCAX and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) have volatilities of 6.62% and 6.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.